|
St. Louis Business & Technology News
www.slfp.com/SLFPBIZp.htm "When you think Saint Louis, think Saint Louis Front Page," a weekly publication covering the news and events in the greater St. Louis area.
St. Louis Front Page P.O. Box 1354 St. Louis, MO 63188 Voice: 314-771-0200 Fax: 314-771-0300 To submit news, contact: editor@slfp.com To advertise, contact: advertising@slfp.com |
Consumer Data Breaches Will Get Worse ST. LOUIS, (PR Newswire), October 1, 2006 - A new survey finds that the current epidemic of data breaches and identity theft resulting from stolen corporate laptops and other mobile devices will continue until more companies take aggressive action to protect the privacy of personal information they routinely collect on their customers -- and ultimate victims -- the consumers. CREDANT(R) Technologies' annual survey uncovers surprising results -- 88% of 426 respondents, representing IT organizations world-wide, say they know that large amounts of personally identifying and other sensitive information reside on employee's mobile devices, and 72% cite that encryption is required to protect personal identifiable information, yet less than 20% have implemented encryption. More than 33 million Americans have become victims of laptop theft since February 2005 according to Privacy Rights Clearinghouse. Consumers, who are potential identity theft victims because the privacy of their personal information has been compromised, are outraged and companies must take more aggressive steps to protect their brand and regain customer trust. With the publicity surrounding laptop thefts and data breaches, it was not surprising that 75% of the respondents to the CREDANT survey ranked laptops as their number one concern for a data breach, but in the comments section, many reiterated concern for sensitive data that resides on any mobile device. 27% of the respondents ranked the automobile as the number one spot for laptop thefts, moving the office into second place from last year with 19% responding and theft from home ranked third with 14%. One respondent stated, "It is not relevant where the device is stolen -- a data breach is a data breach." "Compliance, consumer trust and the impact to the bottom line is driving the need for encryption, but our concern is that even the 20% of organizations who have simply implemented encryption may have a false sense of security because there is much more to being compliant than installing the software," said Bob Heard, CEO and Founder, CREDANT Technologies. "28% of the respondents validated what we designed our encryption solution around -- operational controls and an audit trail that continuously verifies that the encryption software is installed and operating correctly. Without the audit trail, even those organizations who thought they were compliant will not pass the test." The survey findings are particularly disturbing in light of the fact that 52% of respondents state that personally identifying information such as Social Security, driver's license numbers and financial, medical or other confidential personal information is stored on mobile devices. While 62% stated that up to 25,000 accounts would be impacted if a laptop were stolen, 30% percent reported that between 25,000 and 2 million accounts would be impacted; and 5% had no idea of how many accounts were vulnerable. Again, one respondent stated, "It's difficult to know, but one record is too many." In a July 2006 report titled "Data Protection is Less Costly Than Data Breaches," Gartner Inc. estimated a company with 100,000 customer accounts can spend $90 per account breached or $9 million -- not including fines and lawsuits, versus $30 to $40 per employee on data encryption for their laptops or desktops. Only 38% of survey respondents were even in the ballpark of the Gartner report for the cost per account exposed. Still more alarming, 14% of respondents believed it would cost less than $10 per account! Additionally, only 28% say they consider penalties or fines as a consequence of data loss. The sad truth is the costs are much higher. When asked to rank the consequences of a data breach to a company, 76% of the respondents cited damage to the firm's reputation would be their top concern and 47% also cited loss of customers as a fear. What needs to be understood is that everyone is a victim -- the enterprise, the employee, and the consumer. Today businesses pick up the tab on most consumer expenses, as well as their own remediation and auditing costs or fines. But, what about the price tag for the emotional impact? Consumer stress, feeling helpless and angry, and damaged credit reputations are too often overlooked. Furthermore, who is responsible? Headlines announcing the firing of employees or an executive's departure quickly escalates the company data breach to the individual level, the employee who also becomes the victim. What needs to be understood is that everyone is a victim -- the company, the employee, and the consumer. The CREDANT survey delved into who should be responsible for a breach and asked respondents what consequences, if any, should be carried out. Not surprising, IT management stands behind their responsibility and will share the potential consequences -- even to the extreme of being fired. 36% of respondents feel that the accountability for any data breach falls to the person who lost the laptop or mobile device, while 33% believe that IT management who is responsible for securing the data should be accountable. However, when asked to identify the top three reasons why encryption, considered the primary data privacy and protection option was not implemented, the number one reason cited by 56% of the respondents was lack of funding. The second place response by 51% of the respondents was that encryption was not an executive priority. Limited IT resources was cited by 50% of the respondents as the third obstacle in getting the job done. |
| |||||||||||||||||||